You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 51 No. 4, April 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Neurological Reviews
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (50)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Sparing of Motor Function After Cortical Injury

A New Perspective on Underlying Mechanisms

Michael G. Boyeson, PhD; Jennifer L. Jones, MS; Robert L. Harmon, MD

Arch Neurol. 1994;51(4):405-414.


Abstract



Historically, many theories have been offered to explain recovery of function following permanent brain injury. Because specific functional deficits often occur after injury to certain neuroanatomical locations, it has been tempting to suggest that within the brain, structure equals function (this interpretation, of course, has its roots in "phrenology," the 19th-century practice of detecting mental and behavioral traits by examining the skull's shape). Views that were common until recently emphasized structural and functional rigidity in the brain, which would seem to provide little opportunity for the occurrence of compensation. However, the observation that a considerable amount of spontaneous functional recovery occurs after many permanent brain lesions requires some explanation for the recovery that involves modification of intact portions of the brain. Recent research has provided data that reveal several forms of brain plasticity, including changes in neurotransmitter sensitivity, collateral sprouting, and diaschisis. Evidence supporting claims that beneficial behavioral recovery occurs through such physiological modifications in the brain are abundant in the literature,1-4 although, in general, there has not been any empirical establishment of causality.



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Role of the Premotor Cortex in Recovery From Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction
Seitz et al.
Arch Neurol 1998;55:1081-1088.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Antidepressants on Functional Recovery Following Stroke: A Double-Blind Study
Miyai and Reding
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1998;12:5-13.
ABSTRACT  

A 36-Year-Old Woman Recuperating From a Stroke
Alexander
JAMA 1997;277:1970-1976.
ABSTRACT  

Position Paper: ASNR Scientific Issues Committee 1995
Aisen et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1996;10:1-7.
ABSTRACT  

Amphetamine Paired With Physical Therapy Accelerates Motor Recovery After Stroke : Further Evidence
Walker-Batson et al.
Stroke 1995;26:2254-2259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.