This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A New Perspective on Underlying Mechanisms

Michael G. Boyeson, PhD; Jennifer L. Jones, MS; Robert L. Harmon, MD

Arch Neurol. 1994;51(4):405-414.

Abstract
Historically, many theories have been offered to explain recovery of function following permanent brain injury. Because specific functional deficits often occur after injury to certain neuroanatomical locations, it has been tempting to suggest that within the brain, structure equals function (this interpretation, of course, has its roots in "phrenology," the 19th-century practice of detecting mental and behavioral traits by examining the skull's shape). Views that were common until recently emphasized structural and functional rigidity in the brain, which would seem to provide little opportunity for the occurrence of compensation. However, the observation that a considerable amount of spontaneous functional recovery occurs after many permanent brain lesions requires some explanation for the recovery that involves modification of intact portions of the brain. Recent research has provided data that reveal several forms of brain plasticity, including changes in neurotransmitter sensitivity, collateral sprouting, and diaschisis. Evidence supporting claims that beneficial behavioral recovery occurs through such physiological modifications in the brain are abundant in the literature,^1-4 although, in general, there has not been any empirical establishment of causality.

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Role of the Premotor Cortex in Recovery From Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction
Seitz et al.
Arch Neurol 1998;55:1081-1088.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Antidepressants on Functional Recovery Following Stroke: A Double-Blind Study
Miyai and Reding
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1998;12:5-13.
ABSTRACT  

A 36-Year-Old Woman Recuperating From a Stroke
Alexander
JAMA 1997;277:1970-1976.
ABSTRACT  

Position Paper: ASNR Scientific Issues Committee 1995
Aisen et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1996;10:1-7.
ABSTRACT  

Amphetamine Paired With Physical Therapy Accelerates Motor Recovery After Stroke : Further Evidence
Walker-Batson et al.
Stroke 1995;26:2254-2259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT