You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 51 No. 2, February 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Immunosuppressive Treatment of Motor Neuron Syndromes

Attempts to Distinguish a Treatable Disorder

Ersin Tan, MD; D. Joanne Lynn, MD; Anthony A. Amato, MD; John T. Kissel, MD; Kottil W. Rammohan, MD; Zarife Sahenk, MD; John R. Warmolts, MD; Carlayne E. Jackson, MD; Richard J. Barohn, MD; Jerry R. Mendell, MD

Arch Neurol. 1994;51(2):194-200.


Abstract

Objective
To determine if response to immunosuppressive treatment in motor neuron syndromes could be predicted on the basis of clinical features, anti-GM1 antibodies, or conduction block.

Design
Prospective, uncontrolled, treatment trial using prednisone for 4 months followed by intravenous cyclophosphamide (3 g/m2) continued orally for 6 months.

Setting
All patients were referred to university hospital medical centers.

Patients
Sixty-five patients with motor neuron syndromes were treated with prednisone; 11 patients had elevated GM1 antibody titers, and 11 patients had conduction block. Forty-five patients received cyclophosphamide, eight of whom had elevated GM1 antibodies and 10 had conduction block.

Results
One patient responded to prednisone, and five patients responded to cyclophosphamide treatment. Only patients with a lower motor neuron syndrome and conduction block improved with either treatment. Response to treatment did not correlate with GM1 antibodies.

Conclusions
GM1 antibodies did not serve as a marker for improvement in patients with motor neuron syndrome treated with immunosuppressive drugs. Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis failed to improve irrespective of laboratory findings.



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Neurology, The Ohio State University, Columbus (Drs Tan, Lynn, Amato, Kissel, Rammohan, Sahenk, Warmolts, and Mendell), and The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio (Drs Jackson and Barohn).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Brachial amyotrophic diplegia: A slowly progressive motor neuron disorder
Katz et al.
Neurology 1999;53:1071-1071.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in lower motor neuron disease associated with highly raised anti-GM1 antibodies
van den Berg et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1997;63:674-677.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of primary Sjogren's syndrome with hydroxychloroquine : a retrospective, open-label study
Fox et al.
Lupus 1996;5:S31-S36.
ABSTRACT  

Immunosuppressive Treatment of Motor Neuron Syndromes
Pestronk
Arch Neurol 1995;52:230-230.
ABSTRACT  

Immunosuppressive Treatment of Motor Neuron Syndromes-Reply
Tan et al.
Arch Neurol 1995;52:230-231.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.