This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (143)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Sureyya S. Dikmen, PhD; Nancy R. Temkin, PhD; Joan E. Machamer, MA; Ann Lu Holubkov, MA; Robert T. Fraser, PhD; H. Richard Winn, MD

Arch Neurol. 1994;51(2):177-186.

Abstract
Objective
Determine rates of, and factors predictive of, return to work in patients with civilian traumatic head injuries.

Design
Inception cohort study with 1- to 2-year follow-up.

Setting
Hospitalized patients in a level I trauma center.

Patients
Three hundred sixty-six hospitalized head-injured subjects who were workers before injury and 95 comparison subjects participated in prospective, longitudinal investigations of employment following head injury. Head-injured and comparison subjects were similar on basic demographics and preinjury employment status. The comparison subjects consisted of patients who sustained traumatic injury to the body but not to the head.

Main Outcome Measure
Time taken to return to work following head injury.

Results
Survival methodology was used for analysis. Whether patients returned to work and when related to both the characteristics of the injured patients (eg, education, preinjury work history), the severity of head injury and associated neuropsychologic problems, and severity of other system injuries. More precise predictions were possible using the multivariate model.

Conclusions
The present study provides a means of assessing employment potential predictively. This can be useful for clinical and research purposes. The results should be used cautiously and should stimulate discussions of appropriate use of services and resources to meet individual patients' needs.

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Rehabilitation Medicine (Drs Dikmen and Fraser and Ms Machamer), Neurological Surgery (Drs Temkin, Fraser, Dikmen, and Winn and Ms Holubkov), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (Dr Dikmen), and Biostatistics (Dr Temkin), University of Washington, Seattle.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--III and Malingering in Traumatic Brain Injury: Classification Accuracy in Known Groups
Curtis et al.
Assessment 2009;16:401-414.
ABSTRACT  

Comparison of indices of traumatic brain injury severity: Glasgow Coma Scale, length of coma and post-traumatic amnesia
Sherer et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2008;79:678-685.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Longitudinal cognitive changes in traumatic brain injury: A 30-year follow-up study
Himanen et al.
Neurology 2006;66:187-192.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Emergency department management of mild traumatic brain injury in the USA
Bazarian et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2005;22:473-477.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychiatric effects of traumatic brain injury events in Cambodian survivors of mass violence
MOLLICA et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2002;181:339-347.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

State level estimates of the incidence and economic burden of head injuries stemming from non-universal use of bicycle helmets
Schulman et al.
Inj. Prev. 2002;8:47-52.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury
Gentleman
Trauma 2001;3:193-204.
ABSTRACT  

The Predictive Validity of the Newcastle Independence Assessment Form Research (NIAF-R): Further Development of an Alternative Measure
Semlyen et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1997;11:213-218.
ABSTRACT