You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 51 No. 11, November 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

4-Aminopyridine Is Superior to 3,4-Diaminopyridine in the Treatment of Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Chris H. Polman, MD, PhD; Frits W. Bertelsmann, MD, PhD; Ron de Waal, MD; Harriet A. M. van Diemen, MD, PhD; Bernard M. J. Uitdehaag, MD; Arie C. van Loenen, PharmD; Johan C. Koetsier, MD, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1994;51(11):1136-1139.


Abstract

Objective
To compare the efficacy and toxicity of 4-aminopyridine and 3,4-diaminopyridine in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Design
Intervention study with a before-after design and a randomized, double-blind, crossover design.

Setting
University referral center.

Patients
Twenty-four patients with definite multiple sclerosis who had been treated in a previous clinical trial with 4-aminopyridine.

Interventions
Nonresponders to treatment with 4-aminopyridine (14 patients) were treated with 3,4-diaminopyridine in a 4-week, open-label trial with doses up to 1.0 mg/kg of body weight (before-after design). Responders to treatment with 4-aminopyridine (10 patients) participated in a comparative study of 6 weeks' duration with 4-aminopyridine and 3,4-diaminopyridine according to a randomized, double-blind, double-crossover design.

Main Outcome Measures
Neurophysiologic variables for nonresponders, neurologic functions and symptoms on a visual analogue scale for responders, and side effects for both groups.

Results
Toxicity profiles of 4-aminopyridine and 3,4-diaminopyridine were different, and systemic tolerability was reduced for 3,4-diaminopyridine. 4-Aminopyridine was more effective than 3,4-diaminopyridine, especially for ambulation, fatigue, and overall daily functioning.

Conclusion
Our data suggest that, concerning both efficacy and side effects, 4-aminopyridine is superior to 3,4-diaminopyridine in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis.



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Neurology (Drs Polman, Bertelsmann, de Waal, van Diemen, Uitdehaag, and Koetsier) and Pharmacy (Mr van Loenen), Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dose comparison trial of sustained-release fampridine in multiple sclerosis
Goodman et al.
Neurology 2008;71:1134-1141.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Modafinil for fatigue in MS: A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study
Stankoff et al.
Neurology 2005;64:1139-1143.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmacokinetics of an Immediate-Release Oral Formulation of Fampridine (4-Aminopyridine) in Normal Subjects and Patients with Spinal Cord Injury
Hayes et al.
J Clin Pharmacol 2003;43:379-385.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fatigue in progressive multiple sclerosis: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of oral 4-aminopyridine
Rossini et al.
Mult Scler 2001;7:354-358.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of 4-aminopyridine on demyelinated axons, synapses and muscle tension
Smith et al.
Brain 2000;123:171-184.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.