This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Laurie A. Miller, PhD; David G. Muñoz, MD, RFCPC; Maria Finmore

Arch Neurol. 1993;50(4):391-394.

Abstract
• Objective.
—To study the effects of hippocampal sclerosis on preoperative neuropsychological memory tests.

Design.
—Analyses of variance and X² tests were used to compare patient groups (divided retrospectively) with a control group.

Setting.
—Hospital epilepsy unit.

Patients and Other Participants.
—All patients who underwent a temporal lobectomy for intractable seizure relief during the preceding 18 months were included if the following criteria were met: (1) age was between 15 and 55 years; (2) IQ was 80 or greater; (3) the left hemisphere was dominant for speech; (4) there had been no previous brain surgery; (5) sufficient hippocampal tissue had been supplied for pathologic study; and (6) there was no hippocampal abnormality other than sclerosis. The 40 patients who met all of these criteria were divided into groups based on pathological classification (presence or absence of hippocampal sclerosis) and side of excision. Ten normal control subjects, matched to the patients based on age and education, were also asked to perform the memory tests. All subjects approached gave their informed consent to participate in the study.

Interventions.
—None.

Main Outcome Measures.
—None.

Results.
—No group demonstrated impairments on measures of attention or recognition memory. A deficit in learning paired-word associates was found for the left hippocampal sclerosis, right hippocampal sclerosis, and left nohippocampal sclerosis groups, but on tests requiring the delayed recall of information, only patients with hippocampal sclerosis were impaired. For verbal tasks, the delayed recall deficit was limited to patients with left-sided sclerosis.

Conclusions.
—Hippocampal sclerosis impairs the ability to learn associations and to retain information over a delay interval. For the learning and retention of verbal material, the left hippocampus is more important than the right.

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Clinical Neurological Sciences (Drs Miller and Muñoz) and Physiology (Ms Finmore), University of Western Ontario, London.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication October 6, 1992.

Reprint requests to Psychology Department, University Hospital, 339 Windermere Rd, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5A5 (Dr Miller).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impaired verbal associative learning after resection of left perirhinal cortex
Weintrob et al.
Brain 2007;130:1423-1431.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Bilateral hemispheric alteration of memory processes in right medial temporal lobe epilepsy
Dupont et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002;73:478-485.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Correlation of Regional Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Metabolic Changes With Cognitive Deficits in Mild Alzheimer Disease
Chantal et al.
Arch Neurol 2002;59:955-962.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Remote Episodic Memory Deficits in Patients with Unilateral Temporal Lobe Epilepsy and Excisions
Viskontas et al.
J. Neurosci. 2000;20:5853-5857.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Disproportion in the distribution of gray and white matter: Neuropsychological correlates
Baxendale et al.
Neurology 1999;52:248-248.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Commentary on Human Hippocampal Structures: Re: Braak et al
Rafael
J Child Neurol 1998;13:146-147.
 

Neuropsychological Characteristics of the Syndrome of Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
Hermann et al.
Arch Neurol 1997;54:369-376.
ABSTRACT  

Tailored Anterior Temporal Lobectomy: Relation Between Extent of Resection of Mesial Structures and Postsurgical Seizure Outcome
Kanner et al.
Arch Neurol 1995;52:173-178.
ABSTRACT