You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 50 No. 3, March 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Information Processing Efficiency in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Multiple Sclerosis

John DeLuca, PhD; Susan K. Johnson, PhD; Benjamin H. Natelson, MD

Arch Neurol. 1993;50(3):301-304.


Abstract

• Objective.
—To compare the cognitive performance of subjects with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), multiple sclerosis (MS), and healthy controls. All subjects were matched for age, education, and verbal intelligence, as previous neuropsychological studies of CFS had not used appropriate control groups.

Design.
—Case-control design. All subjects were given a neuropsychological battery and the test scores were compared among the groups.

Setting.
—Subjects with CFS and subjects with MS were recruited from private and institutional practice and from the community. Healthy subjects were recruited from the community.

Patients/Other Participants.
—Twelve subjects (all female) with CFS participated in the study. Chronic fatigue syndrome was diagnosed in these patients in accordance with the requirements outlined by the Centers for Disease Control as modified subsequently to not exclude patients with concurrent depression and/or anxiety. All subjects with CFS were referred for a neuropsychological examination to assess persistent cognitive complaints. Eleven subjects (10 female, one male) with the diagnosis of clinically stable MS were chosen from clinics and the community because of complaints of mild to moderate cognitive impairment. The subjects with MS and 11 healthy volunteers (10 female, one male) were matched to the group with CFS by age, education, and estimated verbal intelligence (based on the Vocabulary subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised). The subjects with MS had a mean Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 4.95 (SD, 1.95;range, 2.0 to 7.5). As a result of the matching procedure, there were no differences among the three groups in age (F[2,31]=0.32), education (F[2,31]=0.80), and verbal intelligence (F[2,31]=0.31).

Interventions.
—None.

Main Outcome Measures.
—These measures included the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), Digit Span Test, and the Similarities Test of Verbal Abstract Reasoning.

Results.
—The mean number of correctly identified responses collapsed across the four PASAT trials was significantly different across groups (F[2,31 ]=4.03; P<.05). While the CFS and MS groups did not differ from each other, subjects with CFS (SEM, 124.2±6.4) and subjects with MS (SEM, 112.9±10.9) scored significantly below controls (SEM, 146.4±6.4) (Fisher's Protected Least Significant Difference test; P<.05). There were significant differences among the three groups on mean Digit Span Test performance (F[2,31]=5.5; P<.01). While the CFS and MS group did not differ significantly from each other, only the CFS group was significantly lower than control (Fisher's Protected Least Significant Difference test; P<.05). Mean performance on the Similarities test did not differ among the three groups (F=0.58). In addition, there were significant differences among the three groups in mean BDI scores (F[2,31 ]=7.6; P<.01). The CFS and MS groups did not differ significantly from each other, and both groups showed a statistically significantly elevated mean BDI score relative to the control group (Fisher's Protected Least Significant Difference test; P<.05). No significant correlations were found between BDI scores and PASAT total scores (CFS, r=–.21; MS, r=.13; control, r=.27), or between BDI and Digit Span Test (CFS, r=–.32; MS, r=–.40; control, r=–.19). Results of the PASAT and Digit Span Test were significantly correlated in the CFS group (r=.71; P<.01), but not in the MS (r=.06) or control groups (r=.49).

Conclusions.
—These results indicate that subjects with CSF and subjects with MS show significant impairment on a test of complex concentration when compared with appropriate controls. The data suggest that subjects with CFS and subjects with MS have difficulty on tasks that require the simultaneous processing of complex cognitive information. Selective impairment in information processing efficiency may lie at the root of other cognitive complaints made by patients with CFS.



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Drs DeLuca and Johnson) and Neuroscience (Drs DeLuca and Natelson), University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School, Newark; the Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation, West Orange, NJ (Dr DeLuca); the Neurobehavioral Unit, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, East Orange, NJ (Drs Johnson and Natelson); and the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Center, Newark (Drs DeLuca, Johnson, and Natelson).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 14, 1992.

Reprint requests to Neuropsychology Laboratory, Kessler Institute, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ 07052 (Dr DeLuca).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A shortened version of PASAT-3 is feasible
Solari et al.
Mult Scler 2007;13:1020-1025.
ABSTRACT  

The relationship between neuropsychological measures and the Timed Instrumental Activities of Daily Living task in multiple sclerosis
Goverover et al.
Mult Scler 2007;13:636-644.
ABSTRACT  

The relationship between subjective fatigue and cognitive fatigue in advanced multiple sclerosis
Bailey et al.
Mult Scler 2007;13:73-80.
ABSTRACT  

The PASAT performance among patients with multiple sclerosis: analyses of responding patterns using different scoring methods
Rosti et al.
Mult Scler 2006;12:586-593.
ABSTRACT  

How to detect cognitive dysfunction at early stages of multiple sclerosis?
Deloire et al.
Mult Scler 2006;12:445-452.
ABSTRACT  

Posterior fossa lesion volume and slowed information processing in multiple sclerosis
Archibald et al.
Brain 2004;127:1526-1534.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Single-Photon Emission Computerized Tomography and Neurocognitive Function in Patients With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Schmaling et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2003;65:129-136.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Determinants of health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: the role of illness intrusiveness
Shawaryn et al.
Mult Scler 2002;8:310-318.
ABSTRACT  

Cognitive function and fMRI in patients with multiple sclerosis: evidence for compensatory cortical activation during an attention task
Staffen et al.
Brain 2002;125:1275-1282.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Regional Cerebral Blood Flow SPECT
Lewis et al.
Radiology 2001;219:766-773.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Speed of information processing as a key deficit in multiple sclerosis: implications for rehabilitation
Demaree et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1999;67:661-663.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impairments of attention in individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
Paul et al.
Mult Scler 1998;4:433-439.
ABSTRACT  

Relation between neuropsychological impairment and functional disability in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome
Christodoulou et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1998;64:431-434.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Post-Lyme Syndrome and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Neuropsychiatric Similarities and Differences
Gaudino et al.
Arch Neurol 1997;54:1372-1376.
ABSTRACT  

Disentangling common characteristics is not so easy
Shepherd
BMJ 1995;311:1093-1093.
FULL TEXT  

Cognitive Functioning and Depression in Patients With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Multiple Sclerosis
Krupp et al.
Arch Neurol 1994;51:705-710.
ABSTRACT  

What Do We Really Know About Cognitive Dysfunction, Affective Disorders, and Stress in Multiple Sclerosis? A Practitioner's Guide
Fischer et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1994;8:151-164.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.