You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 50 No. 1, January 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (60)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cognitive Functioning After Common Whiplash

A Controlled Follow-up Study

Bogdan P. Radanov, MD; Giuseppe Di Stefano, MA; Ayesha Schnidrig, MA; Matthias Sturzenegger, MD; Klaus F. Augustiny, MA

Arch Neurol. 1993;50(1):87-91.


Abstract

• A random sample of 98 patients with common whiplash was examined early after trauma (mean±SD, 7.3±3.9 days) and again 6 months later. Cognitive functioning was assessed in conjunction with complaints, pain intensity, wellbeing, subjective cognitive impairment, neuroticism, and medication. At 6 months, 67 patients had fully recovered (asymptomatic group), while 31 were still symptomatic (symptomatic group). Symptomatic patients who were older at baseline, had a greater variety of symptoms, higher neck pain intensity, and greater subjective cognitive impairment. At baseline, both groups scored poorly on tests requiring complex attentional processing. All neuropsychological functions improved to normal at 6 months in both groups. This improvement cannot be explained by a practice effect, as shown by the results of normal volunteers. The symptomatic group showed delayed recovery regarding complex attentional functioning, which may be related to adverse effects of medication.



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Psychiatry (Dr Radanov, Messrs Di Stefano and Augustiny, and Ms Schnidrig) and Neurology (Dr Sturzenegger), University of Berne (Switzerland).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 25, 1992.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychiatry, University of Berne, Murtenstrasse 21, CH-3010 Berne, Switzerland (Dr Radanov).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Development in pain and neurologic complaints after whiplash: A 1-year prospective study
Kasch et al.
Neurology 2003;60:743-749.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reversible neuropsychological deficits after mild traumatic brain injury
Keller et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2000;68:761-764.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Saccadic eye movement disturbances in whiplash patients with persistent complaints
Mosimann et al.
Brain 2000;123:828-835.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relation between neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings in patients with late whiplash syndrome
Radanov et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1999;66:485-489.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cognitive complaints in patients after whiplash injury: the impact of malingering
Schmand et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1998;64:339-343.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

PET and SPECT in whiplash syndrome: a new approach to a forgotten brain?
Otte et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1997;63:368-372.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.