You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 48 No. 8, August 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Kinetics of Anti-Peripheral Nerve Myelin Antibody in Patients With Guillain-Barré Syndrome Treated and Not Treated With Plasmapheresis

Francine J. Vriesendorp, MD; Richard F. Mayer, MD; Carol L. Koski, MD

Arch Neurol. 1991;48(8):858-861.


Abstract

• Serial anti-peripheral nerve myelin antibody titers were determined in 28 consecutive patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome during the course of their illness. Eighteen patients were treated with plasmapheresis and 10 were not. Anti-peripheral nerve myelin antibody titers in the group treated with plasmapheresis declined significantly more rapidly than in the group not treated with plasmapheresis. Five patients treated with plasmapheresis who showed initial clinical improvement, with a concurrent decline in anti-peripheral nerve myelin antibody titer, had one or two recurrences of clinical symptoms during a 2- to 8-week period associated with an increase in anti-peripheral nerve myelin antibody titer. Recurrent weakness was severe enough to prompt additional courses of plasmapheresis. The data suggest that serial determinations of antiperipheral nerve myelin antibody in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome may identify patients with antibody rebound associated with recurrence of clinical symptoms and prolonged recovery in whom further plasmapheresis should be considered.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine (Drs Vriesendorp, Mayer, and Koski), and the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Dr Vriesendorp), Baltimore, Md.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication December 13, 1990.

Read in part before the 41st Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, Chicago, Ill, April 16,1989.

Reprint requests to the Department of Neurology, University of Maryland Hospital, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201 (Dr Vriesendorp).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Therapeutic Apheresis in Neurology Critical Care
Natarajan and Weinstein
J Intensive Care Med 2005;20:212-225.
ABSTRACT  

Use of Cellular and Plasma Apheresis in the Critically Ill Patient: Part II: Clinical Indications and Applications
Linenberger and Price
J Intensive Care Med 2005;20:88-103.
ABSTRACT  

Motor root conduction in neuralgic amyotrophy: evidence of proximal conduction block
Lo and Mills
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1999;66:586-590.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anti-Peripheral Nerve Myelin Antibodies and Terminal Activation Products of Complement in Serum of Patients With Acute Brachial Plexus Neuropathy
Vriesendorp et al.
Arch Neurol 1993;50:1301-1303.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.