This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Jon Currie, FRACP; Ben Ramsden; Cheryl McArthur; Paul Maruff

Arch Neurol. 1991;48(6):644-648.

Abstract
• The ability to generate antisaccades (eye movements deliberately made in the direction opposite to that of a visual stimulus) may be used to assess central nervous system function in a variety of neurologic and psychiatric disorders. However, the usefulness of this paradigm in clinical practice is limited by the need for an oculographic laboratory. We describe a clinical version of such an antisaccadic task and present normative data from 332 subjects. We also examined clinical antisaccades and cognitive performance in 30 patients with Alzheimer's disease, five patients with Huntington's disease, and 12 patients with pseudodementia. In Alzheimer's disease, error rates in the clinical antisaccadic test correlated well with those from a laboratory-based antisaccadic task measured on the same day by infrared oculography, confirming that the clinical antisaccadic test is a valid analog of the more sophisticated laboratory paradigms. Clinical antisaccadic error rates correlated strongly with the severity of dementia in Alzheimer's disease, and correlations with cognitive performance suggested that the clinical antisaccadic test may have some specificity for frontal lobe dysfunction. Patients with pseudodementia had normal clinical antisaccadic error rates, and the test may therefore be of use in differentiating dementia from pseudodementia. This clinical antisaccadic test provides a simple, reliable, and inexpensive quantitative clinical tool that is of value in the assessment of disturbances of higher cortical function.

Author Affiliations
From the Neurophysiology and Neurovisual Research Unit, Mental Health Research Institute of Victoria, Parkville, Australia.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication December 13, 1990.

Reprint requests to Head, Neurophysiology, and Neurovisual Research, Mental Health Research Institute of Victoria, Private Bag No. 3, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3052 (Dr Currie).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Outcomes comparison of 5 coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits versus an uncoated control group of patients undergoing cardiac surgery
Marcoux et al.
Perfusion 2009;24:307-315.
ABSTRACT  

Oculomotor function in frontotemporal lobar degeneration, related disorders and Alzheimer's disease
Garbutt et al.
Brain 2008;131:1268-1281.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medial versus lateral frontal lobe contributions to voluntary saccade control as revealed by the study of patients with frontal lobe degeneration.
Boxer et al.
J. Neurosci. 2006;26:6354-6363.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Saccadic eye movement changes in Parkinson's disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies
Mosimann et al.
Brain 2005;128:1267-1276.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antisaccades: Probing cognitive flexibility with eye movements
Zee and Lasker
Neurology 2004;63:1554-1554.
FULL TEXT  

Inhibitory functioning in Alzheimer's disease
Amieva et al.
Brain 2004;127:949-964.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Using saccades as a research tool in the clinical neurosciences
Leigh and Kennard
Brain 2004;127:460-477.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Spectrum of Saccade System Function in Alzheimer Disease
Shafiq-Antonacci et al.
Arch Neurol 2003;60:1272-1278.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Combining Cognitive Testing and Informant Report to Increase Accuracy in Screening for Dementia
Mackinnon and Mulligan
Am. J. Psychiatry 1998;155:1529-1535.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Disturbed striatoprefrontal mediated visual behaviour in moderate to severe parkinsonian patients
Crevits and De Ridder
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1997;63:296-299.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Alternative Methods of Screening for Dementia in Clinical Settings
Mulligan et al.
Arch Neurol 1996;53:532-536.
ABSTRACT