You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 48 No. 5, May 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Evaluation of Stenosis of the Carotid Bifurcation With Magnetic Resonance Angiographic Techniques

Daniel K. Kido, MD; Robert J. Panzer, MD; Jerzy Szumowski, PhD; Joshua Hollander, MD; Leena M. Ketonen, MD, PhD; Ahmad Monajati, MD; Kenneth Ouriel, MD; James V. Manzione, MD, DMD; Charles L. Dumoulin, PhD; Steven P. Souza, PhD; Jill L. Katz, RN; Barbara M. Rothenberg, MPA, MA

Arch Neurol. 1991;48(5):484-489.


Abstract

• We evaluated the images of 60 carotid artery bifurcations in 31 patients suspected to have carotid artery disease who underwent invasive carotid angiography and combined two-dimensional, phase-sensitive and a gradient-echo magnetic resonance angiography. The phase scans consisted of seven serial projections that were obtained at 20° intervals (11.0 minutes) around the carotid bifurcation; the gradient-echo (GRASS) scans were composed of 11 axial images (2.4 minutes) acquired through the bifurcation. The two magnetic resonance angiographic techniques yielded complementary pieces of information and were used together to compare magnetic resonance angiography with invasive angiography. Comparison of magnetic resonance and invasive angiograms of the 60 carotid arteries shows that the sensitivity (86%) and specificity (92%) of the magnetic resonance angiographic techniques we used to diagnose clinically significant carotid stenosis approach but do not reach those of invasive angiography.



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (Drs Kido, Ketonen, Monajati, and Manzione and Mss Katz and Rothenberg), Medicine (Dr Panzer), Neurology (Dr Hollander), and Surgery (Dr Ouriel), University of Rochester (NY) Medical Center; the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland (Dr Szumowski); and General Electric Corporate Research and Development Center, Schenectady, NY (Drs Dumoulin and Souza). Dr Kido is now with the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University Medical Center, St Louis, Mo.


Footnotes

Accepted or publication October 8,1990.

Presented in part at the 27th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, Orlando, Fla, March 23,1989.

Reprint requests to the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University Medical Center, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110 (Dr Kido).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Internal Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Debrey et al.
Stroke 2008;39:2237-2248.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review
Westwood et al.
BMJ 2002;324:198-198.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 79-Year-Old Musician With Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Disease
Caplan
JAMA 1995;274:1383-1389.
ABSTRACT  

Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Duplex Scanning Concordance in Detecting Severe Carotid Stenosis: A Methodological Review
Reed et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1995;29:177-183.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.