An assessment of disability rating scales used in multiple sclerosis

D. A. Francis, P. Bain, A. V. Swan and R. A. Hughes
Department of Neurology, United Medical School, Guy's Hospitals, London, England.

Twenty patients with clinically definite, stable multiple sclerosis were examined independently by three of us at the same visit and given scores on the Ambulation Index, Expanded Disability Status Scale, and Kurtzke Functional System scales. Observer error accounted for 12% to 55% of the variation observed between individual Kurtzke Functional System scores, 17.1% of the variation observed between the patients' Expanded Disability Status Scale scores, and only 3.9% of the variation between Ambulation Index scores. The implications of these findings for the choice of scales in clinical trials are described.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Disability as an outcome in MS clinical trials
Ebers et al.
Neurology 2008;71:624-631.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Teleneurology in patients with multiple sclerosis: EDSS ratings derived remotely and from hands-on examination
Kane et al.
J Telemed Telecare 2008;14:190-194.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Can clinical outcomes be used to detect neuroprotection in multiple sclerosis?
Khan
Neurology 2007;68:S64-S71.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How similar are commonly combined criteria for EDSS progression in multiple sclerosis?
Kragt et al.
Mult Scler 2006;12:782-786.
ABSTRACT  

Quantification of walking mobility in neurological disorders
Pearson et al.
QJM 2004;97:463-475.
FULL TEXT  

Can the Expanded Disability Status Scale be assessed by telephone?
Lechner-Scott et al.
Mult Scler 2003;9:154-159.
ABSTRACT  

Factors related to agreement between self-reported and conventional Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores
Cheng et al.
Mult Scler 2001;7:405-410.
ABSTRACT  

Use of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite as an Outcome Measure in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial
Cohen et al.
Arch Neurol 2001;58:961-967.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of three different ways of assessing tremor in multiple sclerosis
Alusi et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2000;68:756-760.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Kurtzke scales revisited: the application of psychometric methods to clinical intuition
Hobart et al.
Brain 2000;123:1027-1040.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intrarater and interrater reliability of the MS functional composite outcome measure
Cohen et al.
Neurology 2000;54:802-806.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of interferon beta -1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis analysed by area under disability/time curves
Liu and Blumhardt
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1999;67:451-456.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study comparing Disease Steps and EDSS to evaluate disease progression
Hohol et al.
Mult Scler 1999;5:349-354.
ABSTRACT  

Quantification of impairment in MS: discussion of the scales in use
Amato and Ponziani
Mult Scler 1999;5:216-219.
ABSTRACT  

Assessing relapses in treatment trials of relapsing and remitting multiple sclerosis: can we do better?
Liu and Blumhardt
Mult Scler 1999;5:022-27.
ABSTRACT  

Infratentorial atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging and disability in multiple sclerosis
Edwards et al.
Brain 1999;122:291-301.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The psychometric properties of clinical rating scales used in multiple sclerosis
Sharrack et al.
Brain 1999;122:141-159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A questionnaire to assess neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis
Goodin
Mult Scler 1998;4:444-451.
ABSTRACT  

"Summary measure" statistic for assessing the outcome of treatment trials in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
Liu et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1998;64:726-729.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multiple Sclerosis: What Have We Learned From Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies?
Khoury and Weiner
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:565-573.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Population Dynamics of the Disability Status Scales for Multiple Sclerosis
Quick and Schapiro
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1996;10:127-134.
ABSTRACT