You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 48 No. 12, December 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Changing Attentional Demands in Left Hemispatial Neglect

Richard F. Kaplan, PhD; Mieke Verfaellie, PhD; Mary-Ellen Meadows; Louis R. Caplan, MD; Michael S. Pessin, MD; L. Dana DeWitt, MD

Arch Neurol. 1991;48(12):1263-1266.


Abstract

• Seven variations of a letter cancellation test were used to examine how varying attentional demands affect hemispatial neglect in patients with right hemisphere lesions. While the 14 targets always remained in the same location, the number of distractors (zero, nine, 28, or 82) as well as their complexity (one letter or nine different letters) were varied. The percentage of targets canceled in the left hemispace was linearly related to the number of distractors. There were no differences between the complexity conditions. In a second study, the same 14 targets were presented but the distractors (zero, 14, or 41) were all placed on the right. Increasing the number of distractors on the right increased neglect on both sides of the space. Taken together, these results suggest that, while the limited attentional resources of the left hemisphere are biased toward the right hemispace, the absence of contralateral attentional demands allows these resources to be directed ipsilaterally.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neurology, Tufts University School of Medicine and Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 1, 1991.

Reprint requests to the Department of Neurology, Box 314, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111 (Dr Kaplan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex
Vandenberghe et al.
Brain 2005;128:2843-2857.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A systematic study of visual extinction: Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect
Vuilleumier and Rafal
Brain 2000;123:1263-1279.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recovery from visuospatial neglect in stroke patients
Cassidy et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1998;64:555-557.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.