You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 48 No. 1, January 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Dominant-Side Intracarotid Amobarbital Spares Comprehension of Word Meaning

John Hart, Jr, MD; Ronald P. Lesser, MD; Robert S. Fisher, MD, PhD; Pamela Schwerdt; R. Nicholas Bryan, MD, PhD; Barry Gordon, MD, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1991;48(1):55-58.


Abstract

• Abolition of speech production after intracarotid amobarbital injection is generally considered evidence for language laterality. However, complex auditory comprehension may be preserved after injection of the dominant (left) side. The possibility that this sparing may be due to the intracarotid amobarbital injection not adequately deactivating some of the areas responsible for speech comprehension in the posterior part of the hemisphere was tested with a task known to be critically dependent on the left posterotemporal-in-feroparietal region, one assessing visuoverbal semantic relatedness. Even when the intracarotid injection of the left side produced marked deficits of speech production, comprehension of semantic relations was still intact in eight of 15 patients. Ten of these 15 patients also received right carotid injections, none of which affected comprehension of semantic relatedness. These data indicate that the intracarotid amobarbital injection cannot always specify the laterality of all language functions, an important concern when considering surgical procedures in the dominant posterotemporal-inferoparietal region.



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Neurology (Drs Hart, Lesser, Fisher, and Gordon and Ms Schwerdt), Neurosurgery (Drs Lesser and Fisher), Neuroradiology (Dr Bryan), and Psychology (Dr Gordon), The Johns Hopkins University and School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 6, 1990.

Presented, in part, at the 113th annual meeting of the American Neurological Association, Philadelphia, Pa, October 3,1988.

Reprint requests to Cognitive Neurology Division, Department of Neurology, Meyer 222, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 (Dr Hart).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Validity of language lateralisation by unilateral intracarotid Wada test * Authors' reply
Schulze-Bonhage et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2004;75:1367-1368.
FULL TEXT  

Can the Wada test evaluate mesial temporal function?: A SPECT study
Setoain et al.
Neurology 2004;62:2241-2246.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tailored Cognitive Testing with Provocative Amobarbital Injection Preceding AVM Embolization
Moo et al.
Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2002;23:416-421.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anatomic Correlates of Memory From Intracarotid Amobarbital Injections With Technetium Tc 99m Hexamethylpropyleneamine Oxime SPECT
Hart et al.
Arch Neurol 1993;50:745-750.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.