You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 46 No. 6, June 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reliability of Clinical Criteria for the Diagnosis of Dementia

A Longitudinal Multicenter Study

Françoise Forette, MD; Jean François Henry, MD; Jean Marc Orgogozo, MD; Jean François Dartigues, MD, PhD; Jean Jacques Péré, MD; Lawrence Hugonot, MD; Liliane Israel, PhD; Yvonne Loria, PhD; Françoise Goulley, MD; Anne Lallemand, MD; François Boller, MD, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1989;46(6):646-648.


Abstract

• The reliability of the clinical diagnosis of dementia was estimated by comparing the diagnosis made at 1-year intervals on 55 consecutive subjects with suspected cognitive impairment seen at three different centers by neurologists and gerontologists. The diagnosis was based on history and clinical examination, the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (revised ed 3), the Modified lschemic Score, and a computed tomographic scan. Fifty-two of 55 subjects were given the same diagnosis a year later indicating a reliability of 95%. The study shows that a diagnosis of dementia established by simple clinical criteria comparable to the NINCDS/ADRDA criteria affords sufficient reliability to allow the comparability of groups at different centers for purposes of research, including research on the evaluation of the efficacy of pharmacologic treatment.



Author Affiliations

From the Hôpital Broca (Drs Forette and Henry) and the U 324INSERM Centre Paul Broca (Dr Boller), Paris, France; the Hôpital Pellegrin (Drs Orgogozo, Dartigues, and Pere), Bordeaux, France; the CHRU de Grenoble (France) (Drs Hugonot and Israel); the Laboratoires Sandoz, Rueil Malmaison, France (Drs Loria, Goulley, and Lallemand); and the Alzheimer Disease Research Center, University of Pittsburgh (Pa) Medical School (Dr Boller).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication October 19, 1988.

Reprint requests to Hôpital Broca, 54 Rue Pascal, 75013 Paris, France (Drs Forette or Boller).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Practice parameter: Diagnosis of dementia (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
Knopman et al.
Neurology 2001;56:1143-1153.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association between medial temporal lobe atrophy on CT and parietotemporal uptake decrease on SPECT in Alzheimer's disease
Lavenu et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1997;63:441-445.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Survival in Institutionalized Patients: Influence of Dementia and Loss of Functional Capacities
Hebert et al.
Arch Neurol 1995;52:469-476.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.