You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 46 No. 4, April 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Predictive Value of Carotid Bruit for Carotid Atherosclerosis

Timothy J. Ingall, MB BS, PhD, FRACP; Daniel Homer, MD; Jack P. Whisnant, MD; H. L. Baker, Jr, MD; W. M. O'Fallon, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1989;46(4):418-422.


Abstract

• To assess the predictive value of carotid bruit for moderate-to-severe carotid atherosclerosis, the results of carotid arteriograms performed on 1004 subjects were correlated with the findings of auscultation of the carotid arteries. Predictive values of carotid bruit for ipsilateral extracranial carotid atherosclerosis were 77% for localized bruits and 74% for diffuse bruits. The predictive values of extracranial carotid bruit for ipsilateral intracranial carotid atherosclerosis were 16% for localized bruits and 18% for diffuse bruits. Assessing both carotid arteries together, the predictive value of carotid bruit for moderate-to-severe atherosclerosis at any extracranial carotid site was 85% there being no difference whether the bruits were diffuse, localized, bilateral, or unilateral. Diffuse or localized bruits, whether unilateral or bilateral, are equally predictive of moderate-to-severe atherosclerosis in the extracranial carotid artery, but both are poor predictors of intracranial carotid artery disease.



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Neurology (Drs Ingall, Homer, and Whisnant), Health Sciences Research (Drs Ingall, Homer, Whisnant, and O'Fallon), and Diagnostic Radiology (Dr Baker), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn. Dr Homer is now with the Department of Neurology, Evanston (Ill) Hospital.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 22, 1988.

Read in part before the American Academy of Neurology Meeting, Cincinnati, April 17, 1988.

Reprint requests to Mayo Clinic, Department of Health Sciences Research, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (Dr Whisnant).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ophthalmologic Findings as Predictors of Carotid Artery Disease
Lawrence and Oderich
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2002;36:415-424.
ABSTRACT  

Carotid Stenosis in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Relationship to Stroke in the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Study
Kanter et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1372-1377.
ABSTRACT  

Does This Patient Have a Clinically Important Carotid Bruit?
Sauve. et al.
JAMA 1993;270:2843-2845.
ABSTRACT  

Cervical Bruits: Clinical Correlates of Stenosis
Goldman et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1991;42:491-497.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.