You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 46 No. 2, February 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Prognostic value of electrically elicited blink reflex in neonates

J. Tanaka, T. Mimaki and H. Yabuuchi
Department of Pediatrics, Osaka University Medical School, Japan.

The electrically elicited blink reflex (BR) was evaluated in 80 normal neonates and 12 neonates with neurologic abnormalities. In normal subjects, R1 and bilateral R2 responses were elicited both while awake and in a quiet sleep state. Whereas the R1 response was consistently elicited in the active sleep state, as well as while awake, the ipsilateral R2 response was markedly suppressed and the contralateral R2 response was almost absent. The BR in neonates with neurologic abnormalities showed the following variable results: normal, prolonged latency, or suppressed response at initial recording. Abnormal BRs were detected in most neonates with respiratory or sucking problems. While neonates in whom a suppressed response or prolonged latency persisted for over three months had a poor prognosis, those with normal BRs or early correction of the BR abnormality had almost normal development. The BR appears to be useful not only to evaluate brain-stem function in the neonatal period but also to predict subsequent outcome.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.