You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 46 No. 2, February 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Selective Attention in Hemispatial Neglect

Steven Z. Rapcsak, MD; Mieke Verfaellie, PhD; Shepherd Fleet, MD; Kenneth M. Heilman, MD

Arch Neurol. 1989;46(2):178-182.


Abstract

• To determine how increasing demands on visual selective attention affect the symptoms of hemispatial neglect, we studied patients with right hemispheric lesions on a cancellation task requiring various degrees of focused attention. In the target only condition, the patients were to cancel all stimuli. In the targetnontarget condition, discriminating targets from nontargets did not require close scrutiny, whereas in the target-foil condition, discriminating targets from foils required greater attention to detail. Our findings indicate that increasing demands on visual selective attention adversely affect both exploration of the left side of space and visual discrimination.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Gainesville. Dr Rapcsak is now with the University of Arizona, Tucson.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 20, 1988.

Read in part before the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology, New Orleans, May 1, 1986.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex
Vandenberghe et al.
Brain 2005;128:2843-2857.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attentional Load and Sensory Competition in Human Vision: Modulation of fMRI Responses by Load at Fixation during Task-irrelevant Stimulation in the Peripheral Visual Field
Schwartz et al.
Cereb Cortex 2005;15:770-786.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A systematic study of visual extinction: Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect
Vuilleumier and Rafal
Brain 2000;123:1263-1279.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ipsilesional intentional neglect and the effect of cueing
Schwartz et al.
Neurology 1999;53:2017-2017.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Motor perseverative behavior on a line cancellation task
Na et al.
Neurology 1999;52:1569-1569.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recovery from visuospatial neglect in stroke patients
Cassidy et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1998;64:555-557.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Dissociation of sensory-attentional from motor-intentional neglect
Na et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1998;64:331-338.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changing Attentional Demands in Left Hemispatial Neglect
Kaplan et al.
Arch Neurol 1991;48:1263-1266.
ABSTRACT  

A Possible Pathophysiologic Substrate of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Heilman et al.
J Child Neurol 1991;6:S76-S81.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.