You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 46 No. 11, November 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (42)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Computed Tomography, Electroencephalography, and Clinical Features in the Differential Diagnosis of Senile Dementia

A Prospective Clinicopathologic Study

Thierry M. Ettlin, MD; Hannes B. Staehelin, MD; Udo Kischka, MD; Jürg Ulrich, MD; Giuseppe Scollo-Lavizzari, MD; Urs Wiggli, MD; Walter O. Seiler, MD

Arch Neurol. 1989;46(11):1217-1220.


Abstract

• The accuracy of computed tomography, electroencephalography, and clinical features in the differential diagnosis of senile dementia was studied prospectively. Out of 50 demented patients, autopsy revealed 32 cases with either senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type (SDAT), multi-infarct dementia (MID), or a combination of both. Eighteen patients had dementia caused by other diseases. Based on a combination of computed tomography, electroencephalography, and clinical features, senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type was differentiated from all 50 patients, with a specificity of 83% and a sensitivity of 80%. Focusing on senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type, multi-infarct dementia, or a combination of both, specificity decreased to 65% and sensitivity to 47%. Comparing the different methods, multi-infarct processes were diagnosed with a higher sensitivity by the clinical features (73%) than by computed tomography (18%) or electroencephalography (18%). None of the methods validly differentiated multi-infarct dementia from a combination of multi-infarct dementia and senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type.



Author Affiliations

From the Neurological Clinic (Drs Ettlin and Kischka), and the Geriatric Clinic (Drs Staehelin and Seiler), and the Neuropathology Division, Department of Pathology (Dr Ulrich), and the Division of Electrophysiology, Neurological Clinic (Dr Scollo-Lavizzari), and the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology (Dr Wiggli), University of Basel (Switzerland).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication January 19, 1989.

Reprint requests to Neurological Clinic, University of Basel, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland (Dr Ettlin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Value of Quantitative Electroencephalography in Clinical Psychiatry: A Report by the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association
Coburn et al.
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi. 2006;18:460-500.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Failure of CT Scan to Detect Ischemic Lesions in Patients With Dementia
Kurita et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1993;6:245-250.
ABSTRACT  

Does Computed Tomographic Brain Imaging Have a Place in the Diagnosis of Dementia?
Engel and Gelber
Arch Intern Med 1992;152:1437-1440.
ABSTRACT  

Neuropathologically Confirmed Alzheimer's Disease: Clinical Diagnoses in 394 Cases
Mendez et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1991;4:26-29.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.