You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 45 No. 5, May 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer Type

Subject Attrition and Testability in Research

Jack Botwinick, PhD; Martha Storandt, PhD; Leonard Berg, MD; Susan Boland

Arch Neurol. 1988;45(5):493-496.


Abstract

• There are inherent methodologic problems in investigating senile dementia of the Alzheimer type (SDAT) but this study indicated that, with regard to behavioral test measurement, some of the obvious problems are partially mitigated. First, these data showed that the progressive decline seen in longitudinal SDAT studies is of the same type and magnitude seen in cross-sectional comparisons. Thus, comparing SDAT groups differing in severity provides for the same observations as following up subjects with mild SDAT over time. This study also demonstrates that with certain kinds of tests, selective subject attrition may not be any greater in longitudinal investigations than found in normal aging research. Subjects who dropped out of the longitudinal study were not that different from those who remained in, at least in terms of initial test performance on challenging tests. In this study less than 5% of the subjects with SDAT originally classified as being in the mild stage of the disease remained in this stage after 63/4 years of investigation. This inexorable downward path of the subject with SDAT is what appears paramount. Given the similarity of staging in longitudinal and cross-sectional studies, prior test performance levels in the latter studies can be ascertained even if with less accuracy than in longitudinal studies.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychology, Washington University (Drs Botwinick and Storandt and Ms Boland), and the Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine (Dr Berg), St Louis.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 5, 1987.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychology, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130 (Dr Botwinick).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cognitive Test Performance in Detecting, Staging, and Tracking Alzheimer's Disease
Locascio et al.
Arch Neurol 1995;52:1087-1099.
ABSTRACT  

Paired Associate Learning in Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer Type
Duchek et al.
Arch Neurol 1991;48:1038-1040.
ABSTRACT  

On Drawing Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease
Kirk and Kertesz
Arch Neurol 1991;48:73-77.
ABSTRACT  

Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease
Rebok et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1990;3:91-97.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.