You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 45 No. 1, January 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Talking to comatose patients

J. La Puma, D. L. Schiedermayer, A. E. Gulyas and M. Siegler
Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Hospitals and Clinics, IL.

Physicians may not talk to comatose patients for several reasons. Comatose patients do not seem to hear or respond. Speaking may not affect their clinical outcome; time spent with them takes time away from other, more "viable" patients. Comatose patients may, however, hear; many have normal brain-stem auditory evoked responses and normal physiologic responses to auditory stimuli. Not talking to comatose patients may promote the notion that they are dead or nearly dead; not talking may become a self-fulfilling prophecy, influencing physicians to inappropriately withhold or withdraw therapy. Because comatose patients are especially vulnerable, and because some comatose patients may recover, physicians should consider talking to these patients. Our analysis suggests that families, medical students, and house staff would benefit from the humane example modeled by those clinicians who care for and talk to all patients.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria
Coleman et al.
Neurology 2002;58:506-507.
FULL TEXT  

King's Theory: A Critique of the Critiques
Carter and Dufour
Nurs Sci Q 1994;7:128-133.
ABSTRACT  

Models of rehabilitation programmes for the brain- injured adult. II: model services and suggestions for change in the UK
McMillan and Greenwood
Clin Rehabil 1993;7:346-355.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.