You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 44 No. 7, July 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Further Observations on Cerebral or Retinal Ischemia in Patients With Right-Left Intracardiac Shunts

José Biller, MD; Maryl R. Johnson, MD; Harold P. Adams, Jr, MD; Richard E. Kerber, MD; James J. Corbett, MD; Askiel Bruno, MD; Richard J. Leth, MD

Arch Neurol. 1987;44(7):740-743.


Abstract

• Between October 1983 and November 1986, 20 patients suspected of having a paradoxical cerebral or retinal embolism were identified. Cerebral infarction was the most common presentation. Six patients had a patent foramen ovale demonstrated by cardiac catheterization or surgery. Three patients had a newly discovered atrial septal defect, and one had an atrial septal defect that had previously been treated surgically. Results of the cardiac physical examination, chest roentgenography, and electrocardiography were unremarkable in 12 patients. Eighteen patients had a right-to-left shunt demonstrated by contrast echocardiography. Nine of these patients underwent cardiac catheterization; seven had abnormal catheterization study results: four had a patent foramen ovale and three had an atrial septal defect. Sixteen patients received medical therapy only while four underwent surgery. All patients survived the initial insult. There were no deaths or ischemic recurrences on follow-up ranging from one month to three years. We believe that contrast echocardiography can provide important diagnostic information, even in situations in which cardiac involvement is not suspected. Additional studies are needed before the optimal treatment of presumptive paradoxical cerebral embolism can be determined.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neurology, Division of Cerebrovascular Diseases (Drs Biller, Adams, Corbett, Bruno, and Leth), the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology (Drs Johnson and Kerber), and the Department of Ophthalmology (Dr Corbett), University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 30, 1987.

Reprint requests to Department of Neurology, Division of Cerebrovascular Diseases, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242 (Dr Biller).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

An Electrocardiographic Criterion for Diagnosis of Patent Foramen Ovale Associated With Ischemic Stroke
Ay et al.
Stroke 1998;29:1393-1397.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impending Paradoxical Embolism
Meacham III et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:438-448.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Massive Spinal Cord Infarction With Multiple Paradoxical Embolism: A Case Report
Mori et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1993;44:251-256.
ABSTRACT  

Patent Foramen Ovale as a Risk Factor for Cryptogenic Stroke
Di Tullio et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1992;117:461-465.
ABSTRACT  

Cardiogenic Brain Embolism: The Second Report of the Cerebral Embolism Task Force
Arch Neurol 1989;46:727-743.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.