 |
 |

Trimodal Evoked Potentials Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
Barbara S. Giesser, MD;
Diane Kurtzberg, PhD;
Herbert G. Vaughan, Jr, MD;
Joseph C. Arezzo, PhD;
Mindy L. Aisen, MD;
Charles R. Smith, MD;
Nicholas G. LaRocca, PhD;
Labe C. Scheinberg, MD
Arch Neurol. 1987;44(3):281-284.
Abstract
 |  |
Twenty-three patients with the clinical diagnosis of possible multiple sclerosis (MS) were tested with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and trimodal evoked potentials. Fourteen patients showed abnormalities on both MRI scans and at least one evoked potential modality (65%). Four patients had normal MRI scans but at least one abnormality on evoked potential testing (17%). One patient had normal triple evoked potentials with an abnormal MRI result. Four patients had normal results on both MRI and triple evoked potential testing; two of these patients were later found to have immunologic abnormalities in the cerebrospinal fluid consistent with the diagnosis of MS. Combined evoked potential testing was found to have a higher sensitivity than MRI in confirming a diagnosis of MS. Three patients with the clinical diagnosis of definite MS were also tested. All these patients showed abnormalities on evoked potential testing, although one patient had a normal MRI result. Of all 26 patients who were studied, 17 showed abnormal MRI results and 21 showed at least one abnormality on evoked potential testing.
Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Neurology (Drs Giesser, Kurtzberg, Vaughan, Arezzo, Aisen, Smith, LaRocca, and Scheinberg), Neuroscience (Drs Kurtzberg, Vaughan, and Arezzo), and Rehabilitation Medicine (Dr Scheinberg), the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Oct 20, 1986.
Reprint requests to the Multiple Sclerosis Care Center, Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY 10461 (Dr Giesser).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Randomized study of antibodies to IFN-g and TNF-a in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
Skurkovich et al.
Mult Scler 2001;7:277-284.
ABSTRACT
Conduction deficits of callosal fibres in early multiple sclerosis
Schmierer et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2000;68:633-638.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Systemic Autoimmune Features and Multiple Sclerosis: A 5-Year Follow-up Study
Tourbah et al.
Arch Neurol 1998;55:517-521.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Randomized Trial of Test Result Sequencing in Patients With Suspected Multiple Sclerosis
O'Connor et al.
Arch Neurol 1994;51:53-59.
ABSTRACT
Clinical Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: The Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ancillary Testing
Giang et al.
Arch Neurol 1994;51:61-66.
ABSTRACT
Evoked Potentials As Outcome Measures in Multiple Sclerosis
Giesser
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1993;7:99-104.
Primary Lateral Sclerosis: A Clinical Diagnosis Reemerges
Younger et al.
Arch Neurol 1988;45:1304-1307.
ABSTRACT
|