You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 44 No. 2, February 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Visual Loss in Pseudotumor Cerebri

Incidence and Defects Related to Visual Field Strategy

Michael Wall, MD; Donna George, RN

Arch Neurol. 1987;44(2):170-175.


Abstract

• Visual field examinations were performed serially on 20 patients with pseudotumor cerebri using a modified Armaly-Drance visual field strategy with a Goldmann perimeter as well as an automated perimeter (Octopus). Visual loss was found in 75% of eyes using the manual strategy and in 77.5% of eyes with automated threshold perimetry. This incidence of visual loss is 50% greater than any previously reported series. All major defects detected were present with both types of perimetry. Both strategies were more sensitive for documenting visual loss than previously described strategies. Since therapy for pseudotumor cerebri is determined by the degree and progression of visual loss, a specific sensitive strategy, rather than routine screening perimetry, should be used for determination of visual loss.



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry (Dr Wall) and Ophthalmology (Dr Wall and Ms George), Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 18, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112 (Dr Wall).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pediatric Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Review
Mercille and Ospina
Pediatr. Rev. 2007;28:e77-e86.
FULL TEXT  

Fulminant idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Thambisetty et al.
Neurology 2007;68:229-232.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Doxycycline and intracranial hypertension
Chan et al.
Neurology 2005;64:765-766.
FULL TEXT  

Use of scanning laser ophthalmoscopy to monitor papilloedema in idiopathic intracranial hypertension
Mulholland et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1301-1305.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension in Children: The Iowa Experience
Babikian et al.
J Child Neurol 1994;9:144-149.
ABSTRACT  

The Rational Management of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
Corbett and Thompson
Arch Neurol 1989;46:1049-1051.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.