You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 43 No. 2, February 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Mechanisms of Central Conduction Time Prolongation in Brain-Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials

Jos J. Eggermont, PhD; Manuel Don, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1986;43(2):116-120.


Abstract

• The wave I-wave V delay in the auditory brain-stem response is commonly used as a diagnostic tool in otoneurology. Normative values have been established for different populations and different types of stimuli. This I-V delay has been known for some time as "central conduction time" or "central transmission time." This implies that the measure reflects in normal and in pathologic cases delays due to nerve conduction, synaptic transmission, and neural integration and is not caused by cochlear processes. By virtue of the traveling wave delay in the cochlea, amounting to some 4 ms from the base to the "500-Hz place," it is conceivable that this delay contributes to the I-V delay. From a series of 69 pontine angle tumors in which the auditory brain-stem response was recorded, we selected cases with an apparent peripheral origin of a prolonged I-V delay by comparing the whole-click response to responses derived from highpass noise masking. It seems that cases with an increased I-V delay in the wholeclick response but (almost) normal I-V delays in the narrow-band response are indicative of small intracanalicular acoustic neuroma.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Nijmegen (the Netherlands) (Dr Eggermont), and the House Ear Institute, Electrophysiology Laboratory, Los Angeles (Dr Don).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 3, 1985.

Reprint requests to the House Ear Institute, 256 S Lake St, Los Angeles, CA 90057 (Dr Don).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Normal Brain-Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials With Abnormal Latency-Intensity Studies in Patients With Acoustic Neuromas
Legatt et al.
Arch Neurol 1988;45:1326-1330.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.