You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 43 No. 12, December 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Short-Latency Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials From Radial, Median, Ulnar, and Peroneal Nerve Stimulation in the Assessment of Cervical Spondylosis

Comparison With Conventional Electromyography

C. Yiannikas, MB, BS, FRACP; B. T. Shahani, MD; R. R. Young, MD

Arch Neurol. 1986;43(12):1264-1271.


Abstract

• A study of data on 30 patients with cervical spondylosis was carried out to determine whether short-latency somato-sensory-evoked responses (SEPs) to median, ulnar, radial, and peroneal nerve stimulation provided additional information to that obtained by electromyography (EMG), late responses, and peripheral conduction studies. Peripheral studies, EMG results and SEPs were within normal limits in ten patients with pain, but without objective neurological deficit. By contrast, of ten patients who had objective signs of root compression, conventional EMG results were normal in nine, but abnormalities of the SEPs from radial nerve stimulation were obtained in only five patients, and were normal from ulnar and median nerve stimulation. In ten patients with clinical features of myelopathy, seven had abnormal median SEPs and all had abnormal peroneal SEPs, whereas EMG results were abnormal in only five patients. It is suggested that SEPs and EMG are both of limited use in patients with only symptoms of root compression. In patients with signs of root compression, EMG is the most sensitive procedure; however, some additional information can be obtained from superficial radial SEPs. In patients with cervical myelopathy, SEP was the most useful procedure, especially when upper and lower limbs were studied.



Author Affiliations

From the Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. Dr Yiannikas is presently with the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Sydney University, and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 10, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Neurophysiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown 2050, New South Wales, Australia (Dr Yiannikas).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly people: a high incidence of conduction block at C3-4 or C4-5
Tani et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1999;66:456-464.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multimodality Evoked Potentials in Motor Neuron Disease
Subramaniam and Yiannikas
Arch Neurol 1990;47:989-994.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.