You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 43 No. 11, November 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CONSENSUS IN NEUROLOGY
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Controversies and Consensus in Neurology

—Vladimir Hachinski, MD, FRCP(C); —Vladimir Hachinski, MD, FRCP(C)

Arch Neurol. 1986;43(11):1164.


Abstract

Controversies thrive on soft data and hardened views, but from time to time the facts force agreement. In this issue, the "controversies" section features one of several periodic contributions on topics where the weight of the evidence has shaped a consensus.

As agreement follows disagreement, so new facts or changing circumstances may render comfortable unanimity into challenged obsolescence. A consensus is but a pause between controversies.




Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.