You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 43 No. 10, October 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Quantitative Histopathology of the Inflammatory Myopathies

Steven P. Ringel, MD; Michael R. Carry, PhD; Arnold J. Aguilera, MD; Jill M. Starcevich

Arch Neurol. 1986;43(10):1004-1009.


Abstract

• This study quantitatively assessed skeletal muscle histopathology in 57 patients with inflammatory myopathy, including 20 patients with polymyositis (PM), 19 patients with dermatomyositis (DM), and 18 patients with evidence of an additional connective-tissue disease. No histologic criteria for invariably distinguishing patients with inflammatory myopathy were established because of overlap in individual measurements, but general histopathologic distinctions were confirmed. In PM, endomysial mononuclear cell infiltration (fibers bordering on inflammation) was usual, whereas in DM inflammation of large vessels, fibers with circumscribed areas of myofibrillar loss, and perifascicular atrophy were seen. Patients with evidence of an additional connective-tissue disease were most similar to the DM patients, with a greater prevalence of perivascular inflammation than in the PM patients. Because of varying histopathology (and presumed varying pathogenesis), future therapeutic trials would be more informative if they were designed using patients with homogeneous histologic features.



Author Affiliations

From the Neuromuscular Section, Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 5, 1986.

Reprint requests to the Department of Neurology, B-185, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E Ninth Ave, Denver, CO 80262 (Dr Ringel).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Polymyositis, invasion of non-necrotic muscle fibres, and the art of repetition
Hengstman and van Engelen
BMJ 2004;329:1464-1467.
FULL TEXT  

Myopathy with antibodies to the signal recognition particle: clinical and pathological features
Miller et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002;73:420-428.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Myopathy with anti-Jo-1 antibodies: pathology in perimysium and neighbouring muscle fibres
Mozaffar and Pestronk
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2000;68:472-478.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Spectrum of Inclusion Body Myositis
Ringel et al.
Arch Neurol 1987;44:1154-1157.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.