You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 42 No. 2, February 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Visual Evoked Potentials in Pseudotumor Cerebri

Per Soelberg Sørensen, MD; Werner Trojaborg, MD; Flemming Gjerris, MD; Bent Krogsaa, MD

Arch Neurol. 1985;42(2):150-153.


Abstract

• Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in 13 patients with pseudotumor cerebri were significantly delayed (99 ± 7.3 ms [mean ± SD]) compared with the findings in 20 normal subjects (94 ± 2.7 ms), although only four patients had latencies outside the normal range. There was, however, a significant correlation between the intracranial pressure and the latency of visual evoked potentials. After medical treatment of the intracranial hypertension, visual evoked potential latencies decreased in patients who recovered and in whom the papilledema disappeared. In one patient with progressive visual failure, the visual evoked potentials were abnormal before disturbances of visual fields and visual acuity were evident. Repeated examinations of visual evoked potentials might be of value in patients with pseudotumor cerebri to ensure neurosurgical intervention in due time to prevent visual loss in patients with impending optic nerve atrophy.



Author Affiliations

From the University Clinics of Neurosurgery (Drs Sørensen and Gjerris), Neurophysiology (Dr Trojaborg), and Ophthalmology (Dr Krogsaa), Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 16, 1984.

Reprint requests to University Clinic of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark (Dr Sørensen).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Monitoring Visual Function in Children With Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparison of 3 Methods.
Liasis et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:1119-1126.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results of Optic Nerve Sheath Fenestration for Pseudotumor Cerebri: The Lateral Orbitotomy Approach
Corbett et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1391-1397.
ABSTRACT  

Visual Evoked Potentials to Multiple Temporal Frequencies: Use in the Differential Diagnosis of Optic Neuropathy
Bobak et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:936-940.
ABSTRACT  

Permanent Visual Impairment in Childhood Pseudotumor Cerebri
Lessell and Rosman
Arch Neurol 1986;43:801-804.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.