You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 41 No. 7, July 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Critical frequency of photic driving in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

V. Ramani, F. Torres and R. Loewenson

Pattern visual evoked response (PVER) and critical frequency of photic driving (CFPD) to repetitive flash stimuli were studied in 68 consecutive patients suspected of multiple sclerosis (MS) and 15 normal controls to assess the diagnostic value of combined PVER-CFPD testing. Clinically, 38 qualified for the diagnosis of MS while 30 did not. The CFPD was found to be unreliable for detecting optic nerve dysfunction (OND) in MS, since well-defined photic driving at all frequencies above 40 flashes per second was not present in 14 patients without MS (47%) and in three normal control subjects (20%). The PVER, on the other hand, was highly sensitive and specific for OND, being abnormal in 12 patients with definite MS (92%) but in none of the normal controls. It is concluded that PVER by itself is a valuable test for the diagnosis of OND in MS and additional CFPD testing is uninformative and may even be misleading.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.