You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 41 No. 4, April 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (91)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Multimodality Evoked Potentials in Closed Head Trauma

David C. Anderson, MD; Scott Bundlie, MD; Gaylan L. Rockswold, MD, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1984;41(4):369-374.


Abstract



• Patients with closed head injuries who had Glasgow coma scale scores of 7 or less were studied with evoked potentials soon after trauma. Of the patients, 39 had brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs); 12, stroboscopic visual evoked potentials (VEPs); and 23, short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs). Evoked potential results were graded from 1 (normal) to 4 (most abnormal). Outcomes were categorized by the Glasgow outcome scale, with good out-come and moderate disability further classified as "favorable" and severe disability, vegetative state, and death as "unfavorable." The BAEPs and VEPs were reliable predictors of an unfavorable but not a favorable outcome. The SSEPs reliably predicted both kinds of outcomes. No instances of "false pessimism" were encountered in any modality. Evoked potential results were more reliable than intracranial pressure, pupillary light reaction, or motor findings in predicting out-come. Frequent occurrence of peripheral auditory injuries was shown.



Author Affiliations



From the Departments of Neurology (Drs Anderson and Bundlie) and Neurosurgery (Dr Rockswold), Hennepin County Medical Center, and the University of Minnesota Medical School (Drs Anderson, Bundlie, and Rockswold), Minneapolis.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication June 8, 1983.

Reprint requests to Department of Neurology, Hennepin County Medical Center, 701 Park Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55415 (Dr Anderson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Detection of Nontraumatic Comatose Patients With No Benefit of Intensive Care Treatment by Recording of Sensory Evoked Potentials
Madl et al.
Arch Neurol 1996;53:512-516.
ABSTRACT  

A Neurophysiological Assessment of Selective Attention Before and After Cognitive Remediation in Patients with Severe Closed Head Injury
Baribeau et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1989;3:71-92.
ABSTRACT  

Neurophysiological Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit
Cascino
J Intensive Care Med 1988;3:215-223.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.