You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 41 No. 11, November 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Serial Evoked Potential Studies in Patients With Definite Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Relevance

Michael J. Aminoff, MD; Suzanne L. Davis, MB, ChB; Hillel S. Panitch, MD

Arch Neurol. 1984;41(11):1197-1202.


Abstract

• Twelve patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis were examined both clinically and electrophysiologically at repeated intervals over one year to determine the clinical relevance of data obtained by serial multimodality evoked potential studies. We frequently found a disparity between the clinical and electrophysiologic changes, and also an excessive variability between test sessions of the responses to stimulation of a clinically involved afferent pathway even when the clinical deficit was stable. Our findings indicate that though evoked potential studies may provide information of diagnostic relevance, their role in monitoring disease progression has not been established.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 16, 1983.

Reprint requests to Room 794-M, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143 (Dr Aminoff).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Multimodal evoked potentials to assess the evolution of multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study
Leocani et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2006;77:1030-1035.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evoked potential studies in the antiphospholipid syndrome: differential diagnosis from multiple sclerosis
Paran et al.
Ann Rheum Dis 2006;65:525-528.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials as a measure of visual pathway pathology in multiple sclerosis
Weinstock-Guttman et al.
Mult Scler 2003;9:529-534.
ABSTRACT  

Visual and motor evoked potentials in the course of multiple sclerosis
Fuhr et al.
Brain 2001;124:2162-2168.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ocular microtremor (OMT): a new neurophysiological approach to multiple sclerosis
Bolger et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2000;68:639-642.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring evoked responses in multiple sclerosis
Comi et al.
Mult Scler 1999;5:263-267.
ABSTRACT  

Neurophysiological and cognitive markers of disease evolution in multiple sclerosis
Comi et al.
Mult Scler 1998;4:260-265.
ABSTRACT  

Evoked Potentials As Outcome Measures in Multiple Sclerosis
Giesser
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1993;7:99-104.
 

Evoked Potentials to Test a Treatment of Chronic Multiple Sclerosis
Anderson et al.
Arch Neurol 1987;44:1232-1236.
ABSTRACT  

Systemic {alpha}-Interferon in Multiple Sclerosis: Long-term Patient Follow-up
Panitch
Arch Neurol 1987;44:61-63.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.