You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 40 No. 3, March 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Multimodality Evoked Potentials and Neurophysiological Tests in Multiple Sclerosis

Effects of Hyperthermia on Test Results

Kenneth R. Phillips, MS; Alfred R. Potvin, PE, PhD; Karl Syndulko, PhD; Stanley N. Cohen, MD; Wallace W. Tourtellotte, MD, PhD; Janet H. Potvin, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1983;40(3):159-164.


Abstract

• Data on critical frequency of photic driving (CFPD), frequency following response (FFR), and visual, somatosensory (peroneal nerve), and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (EPs) were obtained from 20 patients who had clinically definite multiple sclerosis and ten healthy normal subjects in a controlled, balanced study under normothermic and hyperthermic (+1 °C) conditions with a test-retest interval of one week. Normal subjects' test results showed no changes during hyperthermia. Patients' EP and CFPD data correlated well with history, clinical signs, and symptoms during both normothermia and hyperthermia. The FFR test data were equivocal and not fully analyzed. Data from the four other tests showed additional patient abnormalities during hyperthermia. Multimodality testing increased the number of patient abnormalities compared with single tests, and the number increased further during hyperthermia. Test-retest reproducibility was higher during hyperthermia.



Author Affiliations

From the Biomedical Engineering Program (Mr Phillips and Dr A. R. Potvin) and the Department of English (Dr J. H. Potvin), The University of Texas at Arlington; the Neurology and Research Service, Veterans Administration Wadsworth Medical Center, Los Angeles (Drs Syndulko, Cohen, and Tourtellotte); and the Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, UCLA (Drs Cohen and Tourtellotte).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 30, 1982.

Reprint requests to Biomedical Engineering Program, PO Box 19138, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 (Dr A. R. Potvin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Measuring evoked responses in multiple sclerosis
Comi et al.
Mult Scler 1999;5:263-267.
ABSTRACT  

Effects of Temperature in Multiple Sclerosis: A Review of the Literature
Syndulko et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1996;10:23-34.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.