You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 40 No. 12, November 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Diagnostic Assessment of Single Seizures

Is Cranial Computed Tomography Necessary?

Louis S. Russo, Jr, MD; Kenneth H. Goldstein, MD

Arch Neurol. 1983;40(12):744-746.


Abstract

• To determine the usefulness of cranial computed tomography (CCT) in adults with a single seizure, we prospectively examined 62 such patients who were initially seen within 24 hours of the event. Age range was 16 to 86 years. Seizure was partial in ten patients and generalized in 52. Neurologic examination results were abnormal in 28 and normal in 34. Laboratory studies, including EEG and CCT, were completed within the subsequent 24 hours. In 29 patients, CCT was abnormal. Only nine of them had normal neurologic examination results, and only four also had a normal EEG. In these, generalized atrophy was the only CCT abnormality. None of the nine occurred in patients aged 16 to 30 years. We concluded that CCT is not essential for patients aged 16 to 30 years who have normal examination results. In patients aged 31 years or older with normal examination results and normal EEG, CCT may be abnormal but is unlikely to provide essential information. Irrespective of age or seizure type, CCT is useful and essential in patients with abnormal neurologic examination results.



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Neurology (Dr Russo) and Department of Internal Medicine (Dr Goldstein), University Hospital of Jacksonville, and the Department of Neurology, University of Florida College of Medicine (Dr Russo), Jacksonville.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 15, 1983.

Reprint requests to 655 W Eighth St, Jacksonville, FL 32209 (Dr Russo).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Head Computed Tomography Scans in Trauma Patients With Seizure Disorder: Justifying Routine Use
Neidlinger et al.
Arch Surg 2005;140:858-864.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Emergent Neuroimaging in Children With New-Onset Afebrile Seizures
Sharma et al.
Pediatrics 2003;111:1-5.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Practice parameter: Evaluating a first nonfebrile seizure in children: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, the Child Neurology Society, and the American Epilepsy Society
Hirtz et al.
Neurology 2000;55:616-623.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.