You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 38 No. 11, November 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

EEG Operant Conditioning in Intractable Epileptics

Joel F. Lubar, PhD; Harry S. Shabsin; Stephen E. Natelson, MD; Gary S. Holder; Stanley F. Whitsett, MA; William E. Pamplin, MA; Don I. Krulikowski

Arch Neurol. 1981;38(11):700-704.


Abstract

• Eight epileptic patients with mixed seizures refractory to medical control participated in a double-blind crossover study to determine the effectiveness of operant conditioning of the EEG as an anticonvulsant procedure. Baseline levels of seizures were recorded for four months prior to the beginning of treatment. participants then received false (noncontingent) feedback for two months followed by an ABA-patterned training program lasting a total of ten months. Subjects were assigned to three treatment groups based on different schedules of EEG feedback. They were first trained (A1, phase) either to suppress slow activity (3 to 8 Hz), to enhance 12- to 15-Hz activity, or to simultaneously suppress 3- to 8-Hz and enhance 11- to 19-Hz activity. This was followed by a B phase, in which patients were trained to enhance slow activity (3 to 8 Hz). In the final phase (A2), the initial training contingencies were reinstated. Neuropsychological tests were performed before and after training, and changes in EEG activity as determined by Fast Fourier spectral analyses were analyzed. Five of eight patients experienced a decrease in their mean monthly seizure rate at the completion of feedback training as compared with their initial baseline level.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee (Dr Lubar and Messrs Shabsin, Holder, Whitsett, Pamplin, and Krulikowski); and the Department of Neurosurgery, Ft Saunders Presbyterian Hospital (Dr Natelson), Knoxville.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 30, 1980.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37916 (Dr Lubar).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Limitations of the American Academy of Neurology and American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Paper on QEEG
Hoffman et al.
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi. 1999;11:401-407.
FULL TEXT  

Effectiveness of psychological interventions for people with poorly controlled epilepsy
Goldstein
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1997;63:137-142.
FULL TEXT  

Recent Developments in the Diagnosis and Therapy of Epilepsy
ENGEL et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1982;97:584-598.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.