You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 37 No. 4, April 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (31)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Hand Preferences in the Rhesus Monkey

Implications for the Study of Cerebral Dominance

Ruthmary K. Deuel, MD; Nancy L. Dunlop, MA

Arch Neurol. 1980;37(4):217-221.


Abstract

• Cerebral dominance is reflected in man by a seemingly inborn preference for the right hand in 80% to 90% of mature individuals. However, not all of the factors that govern human cerebral dominance are clearly understood. We studied rhesus monkeys to determine if hand preference in that primate also reflected a form of cerebral dominance and hence could be used to elucidate cerebral hemispheric asymmetry as it appears in man. Shortterm experiments provided positive evidence that experiential and environmental factors were sufficient to explain the originally observed hand preference in individual and groups of monkeys. We then demonstrated that training readily induced new hand preferences, further suggesting that monkey hand preference is primarily shaped by experience. Our evidence failed to support previous conclusions of right or left preference as a characteristic of the species. Although handedness based on inborn morphological and functional hemispheric asymmetry as seen in man was not demonstrated, the preferences induced by training in our monkeys were systematically altered by contralateral association cortical removals, suggesting that asymmetries of cerebral function may be acquired in monkeys.



Author Affiliations

From the Edward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics (Dr Deuel and Ms Dunlop) and the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery (Dr Deuel) Washington University School of Medicine, and the Division of Neurology (Dr Deuel), St Louis Children's Hospital, St Louis.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 9, 1979.

Reprint requests to Department of Pediatrics, St Louis Children's Hospital, PO Box 14871, St Louis, MO 63178 (Dr Deuel).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Functional Lateralization of Face, Hand, and Trunk Representation in Anatomically Defined Human Somatosensory Areas
Eickhoff et al.
Cereb Cortex 2008;18:2820-2830.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.