 |
 |

Critical Frequency of Photic Driving in the Diagnosis of Multiple SclerosisA Comparison to Pattern Evoked Responses
Stanley N. Cohen, MD;
Karl Syndulko, PhD;
Wallace W. Tourtellotte, MD, PhD;
Alfred R. Potvin, PhD
Arch Neurol. 1980;37(2):80-83.
Abstract
Patients with known or suspected multiple sclerosis (MS) were tested for abnormalities in visual evoked potentials. We compared the critical frequency of photic driving (CFPD) with pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (PVER). We found the CFPD to be somewhat more sensitive than PVER for detecting abnormalities in the visual pathways of patients with MS. When used together, the two were complementary, each finding abnormalities that the other missed. When evaluating patients with MS with evoked potentials, both PVER and CFPD should be tested.
Author Affiliations
From the Neurology and Research Services, Veterans Administration Wadsworth Medical Center, Los Angeles, and the Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles (Drs Cohen, Syndulko, and Tourtellotte), and the Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas, Arlington (Dr Potvin).
Footnotes
Accepted for publication March 17, 1979.
Reprint requests to Neurology Service (691/ 127), Veterans Administration Wadsworth Medical Center, Wilshire and Sawtelle Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90073 (Dr Cohen).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Preliminary Evaluation of Lowering Tympanic Temperature for the Symptomatic Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis
Syndulko et al.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1995;9:205-215.
ABSTRACT
Simultaneous Recording of Pattern Electroretinography and Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis: A Method to Separate Demyelination From Axonal Damage to the Optic Nerve
Celesia et al.
Arch Neurol 1986;43:1247-1252.
ABSTRACT
Critical Frequency of Photic Driving in the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
Cohen et al.
Arch Neurol 1986;43:315-315.
ABSTRACT
Critical Frequency of Photic Driving in the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
Ramani et al.
Arch Neurol 1984;41:752-755.
ABSTRACT
|