You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 36 No. 13, December 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Brainstem Auditory-Evoked Responses

Normal Variation as a Function of Stimulus and Subject Characteristics

Janet E. Stockard; James J. Stockard, MD, PhD; Barbara F. Westmoreland, MD; Jeanne L. Corfits

Arch Neurol. 1979;36(13):823-831.


Abstract

• Brainstem auditory-evoked responses (BAERs) were elicited from 64 neurologically and audiometrically normal adults and 77 normal, full-term neonates with broadband rarefaction or condensation clicks at sensation levels (hearing levels in neonates) of 30 to 70 dB and at rates of ten and 80 clicks per second. In addition to the known effects of rate, previously unrecognized effects of acoustic phase and stimulus intensity on BAER interpeak latencies (IPLs), and an interaction of all three stimulus parameters, were found. Stimulus characteristics, age, and sex can account for much of the inter- and intrasubject variability of BAER IPLs and morphology. The BAER effects of many of these variables and their interactions have not been appreciated in clinical applications of BAER. Recognition and control of such reducible, methodological sources of BAER variability will enhance the sensitivity and specificity of the test in neurologic diagnosis.



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Electroencephalography, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Aug 14, 1979.

Reprint requests to Mayo Clinic, Department of Neurology, Section of Electroencephalography, Rochester, MN 55901 (Dr J. E. Stockard).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Chronic Conductive Hearing Loss in Adults: Effects on the Auditory Brainstem Response and Masking-Level Difference
Ferguson et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:678-685.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Auditory Brain-Stem Responses in Children With Previous Otitis Media
Chambers et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:452-457.
ABSTRACT  

Mechanisms of Central Conduction Time Prolongation in Brain-Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Eggermont and Don
Arch Neurol 1986;43:116-120.
ABSTRACT  

Auditory Evoked Responses in Multiple Sclerosis: Wave I Abnormality
Verma and Lynn
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;111:22-24.
ABSTRACT  

Postconcussion Syndrome
Shubert
Arch Neurol 1982;39:257-257.
ABSTRACT  

Binaural Interaction in Human Auditory Brainstem Evoked Potentials
Wrege and Starr
Arch Neurol 1981;38:572-580.
ABSTRACT  

Dependence of the Auditory Brainstem Response on Electrode Location
Parker
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1981;107:367-371.
ABSTRACT  

Circadian variation in the latency of brainstem responses and its relation to body temperature
Marshall and Donchin
Science 1981;212:356-358.
ABSTRACT  

Auditory brainstem anomalies in human albinos
Creel et al.
Science 1980;209:1253-1255.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.