You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 34 No. 9, September 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (39)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Motor Performance After Unilateral Hemisphere Damage in Patients With Tumor

K. York Haaland, PhD; Charles S. Cleeland, PhD; Daniel Carr, PhD

Arch Neurol. 1977;34(9):556-559.


Abstract

• Hemispheric asymmetry of sensorymotor control has been hypothesized on the basis of clinical and experimental data, but discrepant data indicate asymmetry may vary with task requirements. To examine this possibility, the performance of normal controls and patients with right or left hemispheric tumors were compared on a variety of motor tasks of varying complexity. Group differences were significant only for the two most complex of six tasks; since these two tasks differ in quality (proximal steadiness and distal dexterity), it is unlikely that quality differences are crucial. On these tasks, the group with left hemisphere damage demonstrated bilateral impairment while the right hemisphere group's deficits were contralateral to lesion site. These results support previous data and Liepmann's hypothesis of hemispheric asymmetry of sensory-motor control. Task complexity and the more specific hypothesis of sensory-motor sequencing are important factors influencing hemispheric asymmetry of control.



Author Affiliations

From the Veterans Hospital (Dr Haaland), Albuquerque, NM, and the Neuropsychology Laboratory (Dr Cleeland) and Statistics Department (Dr Carr), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 8, 1977.

Read before the meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Toronto, Feb 5, 1976.

Reprint requests to Psychology Service 116 B, Veterans Administration Hospital, Albuquerque, NM 87108 (Dr Haaland).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control
Schaefer et al.
Brain 2007;130:2146-2158.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interlimb Differences in Control of Movement Extent
Sainburg and Schaefer
J. Neurophysiol. 2004;92:1374-1383.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Associations of Blood Lead, Dimercaptosuccinic Acid-chelatable Lead, and Tibia Lead with Neurobehavioral Test Scores in South Korean Lead Workers
Schwartz et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:453-464.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neuropsychologic Alterations in Classic and Common Migraine
Hooker and Raskin
Arch Neurol 1986;43:709-712.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.