You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 34 No. 8, August 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Anterior Interosseous Nerve Syndromes

Diagnostic Methods and Alternative Treatments

Kenneth K. Nakano, MD, MPH, SM, FRCP(C); Conor Lundergan; Michael M. Okihiro, MD

Arch Neurol. 1977;34(8):477-480.


Abstract

• Electromyographic and nerve conduction studies on 46 normal controls (12 men and 34 women, aged 9 to 67 years) are compared with findings in seven patients (three men and four women, aged 9 to 60 years) with the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) syndromes, including two patients with bilateral involvement (the first such reported cases, to our knowledge).

Routine motor and sensory nerve conduction studies of the radial, median, and ulnar nerves show no difference between controls and patients. In 46 normal controls (84 different AIN studies), the latency and duration of the evoked action potential from elbow to pronator quadratus was 5.1 msec ± 0.9 (95% confidence interval) and 3.6 msec ± 1.1 (95% confidence interval), respectively.

Five of the seven patients had abnormal latencies from elbow to pronator quadratus while all showed prolonged duration of the action potential. Electromyographic abnormalities of the pronator quadratus, flexor pollicis longus, and flexor digitorum profundi, as well as delayed motor latencies and prolonged duration of the evoked potential of the AIN from elbow to pronator quadratus provide sufficient information to diagnose the AIN syndrome.

Surgical exploration may not be necessary unless there is evidence of a penetrating injury, significant entrapment, or certain fractures.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neurology (Drs Nakano and Okihiro), Straub Clinic, Honolulu, and the Department of Medicine, Section of Neurology (Dr Nakano and Mr Lundergan), Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 28, 1977.

Read before the 23rd American Association of Electromyography and Electrodiagnosis Meeting, San Diego, Nov 5-6, 1976.

Reprint requests to 888 S King St, Honolulu, HI 96813 (Dr Nakano).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Neurolysis is not required for young patients with a spontaneous palsy of the anterior interosseous nerve: RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF CASES MANAGED NON-OPERATIVELY
Seki et al.
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88-B:1606-1609.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recurrent Anterior Interosseous Nerve Palsies Related to Pregnancy
BRUSSE and BURKE
J Hand Surg Eur Vol 1998;23:102-103.
ABSTRACT  

The Anterior Interosseous Nerve Syndrome
SCHANTZ and RIEGELS-NIELSEN
J Hand Surg Eur Vol 1992;17:510-512.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.