You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 33 No. 11, November 1976 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (91)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Single-Agent Chemotherapy of Brain Tumors

A Five-Year Review

Charles B. Wilson, MD; Philip Gutin, MD; Edwin B. Boldrey, MD; David Crafts, MD; Victor A. Levin, MD; K. Jean Enot, MD

Arch Neurol. 1976;33(11):739-744.


Abstract

• Identification of effective single chemotherapeutic agents for brain tumors must precede the rational use of multiple drug combinations. In phase 2 trials beginning in 1968, 158 patients with intrinsic brain tumors (mostly recurrent malignant astrocytomas) were considered evaluable.

The larger trials with more effective drugs produced these results: carmustine (BCNU) response rate, 47%, with median duration of nine months; lomustine (CCNU), 44%, with median duration of six months; procarbazine hydrochloride, 52%, with median duration six months; carmustine and vincristine sulfate combined, 44%, with median duration of only four months; and BIC (5-[3,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-triazeno]imidazole-4-carboxamide), 38%, with median duration of five months. Administration of glucocorticoids was not found to bias the frequency of response.

Forty-seven patients, 26 of whom had responded to the initial drug, received a second drug. Among 26 patients who were evaluable, only four responded to the second drug.



Author Affiliations

From the departments of neurological surgery (Drs Wilson, Gutin, Boldrey, Levin, Enot, and Crafts), neurology (Dr Levin), and pharmaceutical chemistry (Dr Levin), University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 10, 1976.

Reprint requests to Neurosurgical Editorial Office, 350 Parnassus Heights, Suite 807, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143 (Dr Wilson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Effect of Enzyme-Inducing Antiseizure Drugs on the Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Procarbazine Hydrochloride
Grossman et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:5174-5181.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

In vitro Drug Response and Molecular Markers Associated with Drug Resistance in Malignant Gliomas
Fruehauf et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2006;12:4523-4532.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neoadjuvant phase II multicentre study of new agents in patients with malignant glioma after minimal surgery. Report of a cohort of 187 patients treated with temozolomide
Brada et al.
Ann Oncol 2005;16:942-949.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intracranial Tumors--Panel 2
Chou et al.
Arch Neurol 1979;36:739-749.
ABSTRACT  

Quality and Duration of Survival in Glioblastoma Multiforme: Combined Surgical, Radiation, and Lomustine Therapy
Hochberg et al.
JAMA 1979;241:1016-1018.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1976 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.