You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 32 No. 8, August 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (99)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

F-Wave Conduction Velocity in Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Assessment of Nerve Segment Between Axilla and Spinal Cord

Jun Kimura, MD; John F. Butzer, MD

Arch Neurol. 1975;32(8):524-529.


Abstract

The F-wave conduction velocity (FWCV) in the central segment (axilla to spinal cord) of the median and ulnar nerves was compared to the motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) in the more distal segments in nine patients with mild cases of the Guillain-Barré syndrome. In four patients, FWCV was slow despite normal or borderline MNCV. In four others, both FWCV and MNCV were abnormal. One patient showed slow MNCV with normal FWCV. The average FWCV was significantly decreased (40.9 ± 12.0 meters/ sec for median and 42.9 ± 8.3 meters/sec for ulnar nerves) when compared to the corresponding normal values (64.3 ± 6.4 meters/sec and 63.1 ± 5.9 meters/sec). These data support the hypothesis that the central segment of a nerve is predominantly involved in some patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neurology and the Neurosensory Center, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 9, 1974.

Read before the 99th annual meeting of the American Neurological Association, Boston, June 10, 1974.

Reprint requests to Department of Neurology, University Hospitals, Iowa City, IA 52242 (Dr. Kimura).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Transcranial magnetic stimulation in ALS: Utility of central motor conduction tests
Floyd et al.
Neurology 2009;72:498-504.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Isolated absence of F waves and proximal axonal dysfunction in Guillain-Barre syndrome with antiganglioside antibodies
Kuwabara et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2000;68:191-195.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Review Article: Rehabilitation of Peripheral Neuropathies
Berger and Schaumburg
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1988;2:25-36.
 

Late Response and Sural Conduction Studies: Usefulness in Patients With Chronic Renal Failure
Ackil et al.
Arch Neurol 1981;38:482-485.
ABSTRACT  

An Uncommon Manifestation of a Common Disease
Smith
Arch Intern Med 1980;140:1398-1398.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.