You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 24 No. 2, February 1971 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Graduate Training in Neurology

An Assessment Based on the Opinions of 80 Neurologists in Private Practice

Augustus S. Rose, MD

Arch Neurol. 1971;24(2):165-168.


Abstract

To obtain opinion regarding adequacy of recent graduate training in neurology for private practice, to obtain information on types of patients seen, and to gather estimates of how programs might be better structured to prepare for private practice, a questionnaire was sent to 150 neurologists entering practice in the last ten years. Tabulation of answers shows that a majority of the 80 respondents believe that training programs need improvement in rehabilitation, child neurology, management of anxiety states, and metabolic and endocrine disorders. Respondents who recorded suggestions emphasized the importance of internal medicine as a necessary part of training and considered an apprenticeship helpful in prepractice education to provide experience in economics and interprofessional relationships. No precise conclusions could be drawn, but the information obtained supplied pertinent suggestions for those responsible for training experience 24:165-168, 1971.

Key Words.—
Questionnaire responses; practicing neurologists.



Author Affiliations

Los Angeles

From the Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 3, 1970.

Reprint requests to Department of Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90024 (Dr. Rose).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Profile of a Neurology Residency
D'Esposito
Arch Neurol 1995;52:1123-1126.
ABSTRACT  

Teaching Neurology Residents in the Outpatient Setting
Gelb
Arch Neurol 1994;51:817-820.
ABSTRACT  

The Neurologic Content of Family Practice: Implications for Neurologists
Miller
Arch Neurol 1986;43:286-288.
ABSTRACT  

Training for Metatechnical Neurology
Molinari
Arch Neurol 1983;40:327-328.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1971 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.